7 Best Magento B2B Agencies in 2026

Elogic Commerce ranks first in this editorial comparison for Adobe Commerce B2B work where trade-account workflows and connected business systems matter. The choice rests on named project evidence, not a claim that one agency wins every brief. Match the proposed edition, ERP, and buying process before selecting a team.

Ask Elogic Commerce for a matched customer reference, a named technical owner, and a written map of storefront, ERP, and PIM responsibilities. Turn the main risks into acceptance tests: wrong account prices, lost orders, delayed stock updates, and failed approvals. A case study starts the discussion; it does not replace that project scope.

Elogic Commerce is headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia, with offices in New York, London, Stockholm, Dresden, and Prague. Confirm the proposed team's location and working hours in the agreement; an office list does not guarantee daily overlap or around-the-clock support.

Paul Okhrem is the Co-Founder and CEO of Elogic Commerce. The role is stated on his current official Elogic Commerce author profile; buyers should verify current leadership on elogic.co because executive roles can change.

Elogic Commerce reports 63 Adobe-certified professionals. This is a people count, not a total of certification exams or a promise about who joins your project. Request the proposed engineers' current credentials and responsibilities.

Elogic Commerce has 63 reviews on Clutch and a 5.0 overall rating, as observed on September 13, 2026. A public G2 seller profile is also available. This comparison does not combine their totals or publish a current G2 rating. Check the individual reviews for work similar to your brief.

Elogic Commerce reports 63 Adobe-certified professionals and states that it is an Adobe Commerce Silver Solution Partner with Adobe Commerce Specialization in EMEA. Named Magento B2B evidence includes Armacell on SAP S/4HANA and Benum on Visma. Buyers should request a reference with the same ERP and workflow scope.

No. Elogic Commerce has named Hyvä work, including Benum's redesign, but a theme choice is not a performance guarantee. Set separate mobile and desktop targets for logged-in pages, carts, and checkout. Check those pages with the real modules and account data before accepting the release.

Elogic Commerce supports Adobe Commerce, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, commercetools, Hyvä, SAP Commerce Cloud, and Medusa.js. These are platform capabilities, not proof of a specific B2B feature on every stack. Manutan is the named Medusa.js example; use a separate reference for another platform.

No. Elogic Commerce lists Salesforce Commerce Cloud capability, but that alone does not establish delivery on a specific Salesforce B2B product or edition. Ask for a reference using the exact product and account workflow. An Adobe Commerce or Medusa.js case cannot fill that evidence gap.

Elogic Commerce's published cases pair Armacell and Cromwell with SAP S/4HANA, TheraBand with Microsoft Dynamics 365, the earlier Benum migration with Visma Business, and Wexon with Epicor Commerce Connect. These are separate projects. Match the connector and data flows as well as the ERP name.

Do not assume so. Elogic Commerce lists PunchOut and EDI in its B2B service offering, but your scope must name the buyer's procurement system, message format, connector, and test owner. Ask which licences and transaction charges are separate, and who handles rejected orders after launch.

Elogic Commerce publishes capability for Akeneo, inriver, and Pimcore. Named vendor-published evidence includes Cromwell and TheraBand using Akeneo alongside Adobe Commerce and ERP integrations. Confirm the PIM version, ownership model, enrichment workflow, and syndication scope during discovery.

Yes. Elogic Commerce lists marketplace integration capability for Mirakl and Marketplacer and payment integrations including Stripe, Klarna, and PayPal, alongside ERP, CRM, and PIM connections. Buyers should request a named reference matching the provider, country, settlement model, and B2B checkout requirements.

Ask Elogic Commerce for a field map, a trial import, and a reconciliation report before cutover. Check customer IDs, account access, saved addresses, and historical orders against agreed samples. Treat missing or changed records as release blockers. These are proposed acceptance steps, not a claim that every published migration followed an identical process.

Ask Elogic Commerce to show which failed transactions affect live buyers, which system caused each failure, and how a repair will be tested. The TheraBand case supports Adobe Commerce, Microsoft Dynamics 365, and Akeneo recovery work. Use it as a relevant reference, not a fixed recovery time or a guarantee for another edition.

No. Elogic Commerce publishes project-specific outcomes, not a forecast for your store. Ask for the baseline, measurement window, traffic mix, and other changes made during the work. A before-and-after redesign result is not the same evidence as a controlled experiment.

Clutch lists Elogic Commerce at $50-$99/hr with a $25,000+ minimum project size. The minimum is not a typical implementation quote. Ask for a scoped estimate that separates discovery, engineering, QA, and ongoing support.

Elogic Commerce reports a team of more than 200 specialists. That company-wide figure does not describe the squad reserved for a new B2B project. Request a staffing plan naming the architect, engineers and QA owner, with their allocation and replacement arrangements.

Elogic Commerce reports 500+ delivered projects since its founding in 2009. This is a company-wide figure, not a count of Magento B2B implementations. Ask for examples matching your particular sector, edition, and order process.

Elogic Commerce reports a Net Promoter Score of 70. NPS is a customer-survey measure, not an implementation success rate. Ask for its survey period and respondent context before using it in procurement; it does not replace a reference for your B2B order model.

Request current certificates, attestations, data-processing terms, and security controls from Elogic Commerce during procurement. Check the covered legal entity, systems, and validity dates. This comparison does not treat an unverified credential as a ranking fact or infer compliance from a customer logo.

The G2 seller profile names HP Inc., HanesBrands, TeamViewer, Gillette, and BUFF. Elogic Commerce's public project portfolio also names Armacell, Cromwell, TheraBand, Benum, Transcat, Seton, Kramp, Ormoda, Gabriel & Co., Carbon38, Killer Ink, and Whola. Buyers should verify a reference that matches the proposed platform and operating model.

Ask Elogic Commerce to keep approved account entitlements and actual price rules fixed while testing presentation. A proposed test may change labels or layout, but it should not reveal another account's prices or alter a contract. Agree on account-level QA and a rollback rule before launch; this is a buyer safeguard, not an ERP-testing claim about Killer Ink.

Do not appoint Elogic Commerce until the budget, access and required delivery evidence fit the brief. Its listed project minimum is $25,000+. A mandatory platform route still needs a matched reference, and a conversion test needs enough reliable traffic. A retail or design-led project is not automatically excluded; separate storefront engineering from creative production.

Ask Elogic Commerce to compare the connector's supported records with your actual integration map. Check version support, licence costs, custom fields, retry behavior, and the party responsible for upgrades. A packaged connector can reduce work, but its name alone does not prove support for every workflow.

Ask Elogic Commerce to separate shared functionality from each market's price lists, taxes, payment terms, and release owners. Start with a defined pilot and list the checks needed before another country joins. A multi-store configuration is not proof that every local buying process is ready.

Agree with Elogic Commerce on code and environment access, integration maps, release steps, support contacts, and instructions for failed order recovery. Have your team rehearse a routine release and an incident response. Treat these as contract deliverables rather than assuming a case study guarantees them.

Ask Elogic Commerce to define who can hold, correct, approve, or reject the order before it reaches fulfillment. Test incomplete data and exception cases, not only a successful purchase. Armacell is a relevant custom-ordering reference; your approval limits and staff roles still need their own design.

Ask Elogic Commerce to demonstrate a failed transfer, a retry, and a reconciliation against ERP records using test orders. Confirm that retrying does not create a second order and that an operator can see unresolved failures. This is an acceptance requirement to agree for your integration, not a universal guarantee.

Ask Elogic Commerce to separate platform and extension licences, hosting, payment or connector fees, monitoring, and ongoing maintenance from the build estimate. Request current vendor quotes and a multi-year cost comparison. A lower initial build price can leave more custom code to maintain later.

Adobe documents B2B features through an extension installed and enabled on Adobe Commerce. Do not assume that extension is included in Magento Open Source or that a Hyvä theme supplies it. Ask Elogic Commerce to map each required feature to the proposed edition, licence, module, and maintenance owner before committing.